We are facing the stark and escalating reality of what appears to be judicial racketeering. http://www.defraudingamerica.com/racketeering_enterprise.html
The blatant and consistent denial of due processes in direct violation of our Constitutional rights and protections, even on a state level, are overwhelming. This has been accomplished by the construction of tribunals focused on the public, that are constructed with no other intent than to void the very tenents of the Constitutions, both state and federal. While many treatises have been written in an attempt to validate the constitutional authority either under Art.1, Art. 3 or Art. 4, to create these tribunals, none actually do.
The fact that none of these legal scholars can even agree on which Article gives this non-existent authority, is in itself a revelation.
We are the people referred to in those documents. It is our duty to rally for the Constitutions and for law and order.
Although Bar Associations are not government agencies, they are however, allowed to operate as if they were. This helps create the system of self regulation and oversight which is a disaster for the public. This self-regulation and oversight has become the breeding ground for the lawlessness and corruption that pervades our judicial system as rarely any of these “officials” are ever held accountable for their actions. It is the public who pays the price for this perversion and obstruction of our judicial branch.
While you, yourself, may have yet to be subjected to one of these tribunals or the steady corruption of state and federal courts of supposed “law”, you might want to become more familiar with advocacy and whistleblower groups which will reveal a level of corruption many are unaware of. Any “new” victim that I have spoken with, shares a common comment that they never would have imagined it could be like this.
If you or a loved one are unfortunate enough to become subject either to an actual court or one of these fictionalized constructs called “tribunals”, you must become fearless. Document everything. Maintain a paper trail. Log phone calls. Keep an active and current record of everything pertaining to the injustice that is about to be served upon you. Always be on the offensive rather than the defensive; you are dealing with predators and they often have the whole system rigged against you.
Always remember that in a Constitutional Court of Law”:
You have a right to produce evidence
you have a right to a speedy trial
you have a right to the records, recordings and transcripts of your hearing or trial
You have a right to ADA (Americans With Disabilities Act) accommodations
You have a right to face your accuser and to view the evidence against you
Ex parte meetings are prohibited (barring extreme and extenuating circumstances)
In an unConstitutional Tribunal:
The tribunal does not have to adhere to the rules of evidence (required in an actual court)
Does not have to follow the Code of Civil Procedure (required in an actual court of law)
May have numerous ex-parte meetings that you may not know about until long after they have occurred if you ever do.
You have committed no crime...which is why you are in a tribunal and not a court of law.
Is this not corruption? You’ve heard of “there’s no such thing as being a little bit pregnant” haven’t you?
Well, the corrupt breeding ground is overpopulated; not that it is ever okay- like I said, “.... a little bit pregnant”.
Corruption is a form of dishonest or unethical conduct by a person entrusted with a position of authority, often to acquire personal benefit. Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement, though it may also involve practices that are legal in many countries. Wikipedia
So, now let’s take a look at the punishment for this crime and the criminal code in order to interpret just what exactly this could mean.
2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §4 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §4, 35 Stat. 1088).
Word "moreover" was deleted as surplusage and minor changes were made in phraseology.
1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
§2384. Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
(See the link below for the source and complete information)
The Judicial Code of Conduct is seldom adhered to. Meant to protect citizens from unethical or unlawful conduct, and meant to assure the public of the integrity of the bench, it has come to be viewed widely as irrelevant. To me, this failure to protect the public is intentional. The lack of discipline, the lack of morality, the lack of law and of proper conduct is an attack on the country as a whole, from the bench.
Could this be interpreted to be a an attempt to subvert our government? Taking the time to go beyond only mulling this over is why most advocates/activists/whistleblowers become as such.
It is time for a jury of the citizens to rule and in line with the constitution that all citizens are to be treated fairly and impartially. This includes judges, government officials, and representatives of congress and so on.
If a jury of our peers can be commissioned and entrusted to make life and death decisions for the fate of another, well then; why wouldn’t that pertain to judges, government officials, and representatives of congress? Or why wouldn’t that pertain to any public servant in any capacity?
No matter how much you might hear about immunity, this is not written in, or intended to be in our constitution. Our constitution states and is clearly written that the law will be applied equally to all and all have equal access to it. But yet, [they] have taken it, “by force”.
Although these would appear to be treasonous violations that need to be brought to Federal Courts citing and providing the violations of our Constitution, this could prove to be quite difficult because many times federal courts set the standard for the corruption or by their actions and rulings, and validate the corruption in lower courts.
What’s next. It circles back to “We The People” standing up for our Constitution Rights.
Tanya lives in New Hampshire with her two teenage sons; and while fighting for her own justice to provide security stolen from her, and through others
outreach, she discovered she was far from alone by outreach from others. What she learned is what continues to fuel her to do her part and to carry on through her continued advocacy for others as well as her own.
Since 2014, her journey to justice has leaped into the public forum through her podcasts on Marti Oakley’s TS Radio http://www.blogtalkradio.com/marti-oakley
hosting “TNT Tanya Talks; Where your voice is heard, and your story is told, along
with her fb page “Injustice In Oklahoma EXPOSED, a soon to be broadcasting on Lighthouse Radio, and her new webpage “Injustice Exposed” http://www.injusticeinoklahomaexposed.com/
Tanya has been asked to speak on a platform at the 2018 Washington DC Whistleblower’s Summit in July where she looks forward to meeting and learning more about her her fellow peers in the world of judicial/government reform advocacy successes and continued pursuits,
Tanya can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
Her simplified on-going story can be found here: http://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2018/03/new-hampshire-woman-takes-on-oklahoma_12.html